Editorial Policy
Introduction Milfort is committed to delivering reliable, accurate, and trustworthy information on the business sale process. This document sets out our editorial principles, standards, and processes.
Principles Accuracy Our content is created to be precise, balanced, and transparent, based on the best available evidence. Any opinions or conjectures are clearly indicated.
Accountability Milfort values its accountability to the audience, embraces feedback for improvement, and maintains transparency in its editorial process.
Serving the Public We prioritise audience interests in content development, consulting relevant professional bodies and groups while focusing on client interests.
Taste and Decency Our content is suitable for general audiences, avoiding any material that could be deemed offensive.
Impartiality and Diversity of Opinion We are committed to objectivity and impartiality, ensuring diverse opinions are represented, especially in cases lacking scientific consensus.
Privacy We uphold strict privacy standards, ensuring personal information is not disclosed without explicit consent, except when legally mandated.
Standards Milfort’s editorial team ensures content accuracy, balance, and transparency. All staff, including editors, must disclose any conflicts of interest, particularly relating to the business sale sector.
Concerns about conflicts of interest or complaints can be directed to [email protected]. We require similar disclosures from external content producers.
Staff Training Editorial staff are trained to adhere to our high editorial standards.
Editorial Process Research Phase Content is informed by direct industry-specific experiences and peer-reviewed research. Authors consult with experts, charities, and those impacted by the topics.
Production Phase Content is rigorously checked for accuracy, balance, tone, and clarity. It undergoes review for factual accuracy, language, and presentation.
Policy Sign-off Phase All policies are approved by the CEO before being published.
Review of Content Phase Website content is systematically reviewed. Major content is reviewed annually, and less variable content biennially. User feedback is considered for immediate content revision.
Appeals Procedure Unresolved content disputes are escalated to the CEO for resolution.
